François Fillon has aroused the wrath of unions by proposing to move towards a common retirement age between the two countries, without elaborating. But the French and German are not based on the same criteria.
The German model inspires François Fillon. In a speech on the "convergence" tax, the prime minister even tried to bring the debate in the field of pensions. But considering that it was necessary to "move towards a common retirement age" with the neighbor across the Rhine, it has sparked an outcry, just months after the entry into force of reform swept-fought.Since then, unions, employers' policies and comment on his remarks, not always understand what the Prime Minister referred.
If François Fillon spoke of the legal age …
His little phrase is especially feared the unions and the opposition a further decline in the minimum legal age of retirement, ie the age at which an insured can collect his pension. And it has nothing to do with the threshold of 65 or 67 years in force in Germany.It is "easy to talk about such retirement to 67 years in Germany and to face the French 60 years, omitting the one hand, remember that this is for Germany the retirement age full-rate and for France the legal age of cessation of activity, "lamented last year already economist Julia Cage, in a study of the Jean Jaures.
For the first, from 60 to 62 years by 2018 with the last pension reform, is the legal age of retirement. But for a full pension, you also claim a number of years of contributions, 40 and 3 months now. If it did not, it undergoes a discount at least 65 years of waiting-line gradually lengthened to 67 years in 2023 – the legal age which guarantees the full rate, regardless of the contribution period.The French system is indeed one of the few to impose a double bind, age and minimum insurance.
In Germany, for against, it is primarily the first which is taken into account. Employees receive their full pension at age 65 on the sole condition of having contributed five years. From 2012, this threshold will be gradually decreased by one, then two months per year to reach 67 in 2029, according to the reform adopted in 2007.
If he spoke of the age at full rate …
And so Francois Fillon was actually referring to a convergence of ages starting at the full rate, then the situations in France and Germany do not differ that much. In Germany, it will reach 67 years that by 2028. In France, it will be 67 years from 1 January 2023, for the generations born after 1956.The difference is that the French will have all their quarters from before, while the Germans, with some exceptions, can not do with discount.
The German decision to delay the age of two years starting at the full rate is also one reason: the German population is aging while the birthrate falls. The fertility rate is only 1.3 children per woman, against 2 in France, where the birthrate is one of the most dynamic in Europe. The passage of 67 years accompanied by an appeal also more massive premium pension and a decrease in the level of pensions. Between 2007 and 2009, the poverty rate in over 65 rose from 10.5 to 12.1%.
In Germany, the decline in the age of retirement has therefore not been smooth.Very hostile to reform, the unions pointed out that in a crisis, extend the service period is most likely to create unemployment. Especially since the "seniors" are often left behind when the job market is scarce. In 2009, their participation rate was only 56.2% across the Rhine. In France it was less than 39%.